Green App Machine
Posts mit dem Label Feed werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Feed werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

Meet the website Facebook is censoring from your News Feed

The most powerful social network on the planet just exerted its enormous control over the Internet to squash a potential competitor. Facebook, which just announced it averages one billion daily users, is actively censoring any mention of Tsu.co. The social media giant has accused the brash young startup of not complying with its spam policies and now cites every mention of the site made on Facebook, Messenger, or Instagram as spam, censoring any post that includes the site’s URL (Tsu, the popular Chinese name, is still permissible).


While the harsh blacklisting of the site might seem like Facebook using its power over online traffic to crush a newcomer, Tsu.co is no ordinary social media site. While Tsu, like Facebook, is supported by ad revenue, the website promises to give 90 percent of that money back to users who generate original content on the site. What this means is Tsu users have a financial incentive to promote their content more than the average Facebook or Instagram user, which can lead to spam or spam-like tactics for building traffic.


The social media giant has accused the brash young startup of not complying with its spam policies and now cites every mention of the site made on Facebook, Messenger, or Instagram as spam.



“We do not allow developers to incentivize content sharing on our platform because it encourages spammy sharing,” a Facebook spokesperson told CNNMoney. In fact, Facebook has promised to allow Tsu posts and mentions of the site if Tsu disables an app that allows users of Tsu (Tsusers?) to post content simultaneously to Tsu and Facebook.


This would make sense if Tsu were the only site working this way. For one, many social networks—like Bubblews, 3Tags, and even big players like YouTube—practice some level of content sharing with users. Second, Tsu works the way the Internet works. While most sites might not function in the paid-per-click model of Tsu, every content creator on any major site is at least in part being funded by ad revenue.


And there’s a very good chance that ad revenue is owed in part to a sophisticated marketing campaign through Facebook. Data analytics firm Parse.ly found an astonishing 43 percent of the traffic sent to its network of news sites came from Facebook, while Google only netted 38 percent. Similarly, a Pew Research Center report found 63 percent of Americans get their news from Facebook. Indeed, according to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, one out of every five minutes an American spends on a smartphone is spent within Facebook.


This impressive level of control over what content people see means any creator of anything online is highly dependent on Facebook for traffic. Note the mass freakout in the blogosphere when traffic driven by Facebook shares began to slump earlier this year and distinctly dive in August. Sites that rely quite heavily on Facebook shares—like Thought Catalog, BuzzFeed, or the Huffington Post—saw massive drops in Facebook shares starting this past summer, according to the Awl’s John Herman.


This fragile dependency, however, hasn’t stopped such sites from embracing Facebook wholesale, with big name brands like the one fourth of all referral traffic? Ignoring it means you’ll lose out on a large chunk of ad revenue—and being censored from it might even ruin you. As David Fagin wrote on the Huffington Post, “being blocked from Facebook in this day and age is the equivalent of being kicked off AT&T in the mid 70s.”


This is the dilemma Tsu users find themselves today, and precisely why Tsu’s CEO and founder Sebastian Sobczak and his users have taken such umbrage to Facebook’s decision to banish the company from its sites. CNN spoke to one user who posted 25 drawings of dogs every day on Tsu then advertised them for sale on Facebook—an estimated 7,500 dog drawings—before they were pulled for being malicious.


According to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, one out of every five minutes an American spends on a smartphone is spent within Facebook.



What such an onslaught of content can look a lot like is spam, defined by Facebook as “sending bulk messages, excessively posting links or images to people’s Timelines and sending friend requests to people you don’t know personally.” Much of that is implicit in the design of a site like Tsu. Because the site is both invite only and relatively unheard of, it makes sense that a segment of Tsu’s users would continually attempt to lure people on Facebook to engage with their content, as well as produce as much content as possible.


But Tsu hasn’t done anything evil by doing so. All the site has done is offer a “trickle down” version of the same business model that pays for much of the Internet. If Facebook users aren’t happy about Tsu, they likely aren’t happy about any from a long list of websites that purely exist to drive ad revenue. By blocking Tsu, Facebook is challenging the notion that users and platforms can do what publishers have been doing for a generation.


One reason for that is the editorial control publications have over their social media behavior. This isn’t just about making sure the site doesn’t post anything offensive, but also managing when and how often content is pushed through sites like Facebook. An individual Tsu user, tantalized by the promise of real money as they are, might not hold the same restraint and cross the thin line between marketing and spam.


Tsu can work. A single mother from South Carolina posted a series of videos singing her daughter to sleep each night, which went viral and earned her hundreds of dollars of spending money—later netting her a record deal. The website has also found popularity with several celebrities, such as rapper 50 Cent, who has over 131,000 followers on Tsu.


But this shouldn’t be surprising. The individuals on Tsu are attracted to the service because it streamlines the money-making scheme that has built the modern Internet—the more eyeballs, the more money. Facebook knows this story well, frequently topping lists of earners from digital ad revenue. All Tsu is doing is taking the same model that made Facebook—and many, many others—famously rich and trying to spread it out among millions of users. 


Ben Branstetter is a social commentator with a focus on the intersection of technology, security, and politics. His work has appeared in the Washington Post, Business Insider, Salon, the Week, and xoJane. He attended Pennsylvania State University.


Illustration by Max Fleishman



Meet the website Facebook is censoring from your News Feed

Facebook gives users more control over News Feed


The social network has acknowledged that users are the best placed to know what is most meaningful to them and are giving them more control over what they see on New Feeds.


Currently only available to iOS users, with desktop and Android being added in the coming weeks, users can select the people or Pages they want to see first when the visit the social network. The feature will only initially be available to those in the U.S.


“To help prioritize stories, and make sure you don’t miss posts from particular friends and pages, you can now select which friends and pages you would like to see at the top of your News Feed,” said Jacob Frantz, Facebook product manager


The function itself isn’t new. Facebook users have long been able to curate their News Feeds, but it has been somewhat hard to find and not as clear cut as the new in-stream function.


Marketers will need to develop strategies that encourage users of the social network to keep them in view using unique content and offers.


As well as setting who is seen first in a News Feed, the recent update also has options to discover new Pages based on the types of pages a users has indicated they like seeing content from and a Follow/Unfollow tool that allows users to stay connected to Friends but removes them from the News Feed.


Image via Shutterstock


Tags: content marketing, social media, social network




Facebook gives users more control over News Feed

Facebook News Feed Reprioritizes Your Real Friends Above Pages


No one likes brands more than their friends, and there are plenty of ways to get their marketing updates. Facebook’s unique value is keeping you up to date on your real-life friends. So to “get this balance right” Facebook today announced it’s reconfiguring News Feed to show content from close friends higher up, which may push posts from business Pages further down.


A few other tweaks include relaxing the limit on posts shown from a single friend to people with little content in the feed, and showing fewer stories about when a friend Liked or commented on a post so it can give more room to what you’re interested in.


Combined, these updates, like several previous rounds of News Feed changes, could reduce visibility in the feed for Pages. While show more from friends might make the Facebook experience healthier in the long-run, it’s a tough pill to swallow for businesses who’ve built themselves up on Facebook referral traffic.


As competition for limited attention grows, brands have to either work harder to make truly entertaining content people want to see in their feed, or be forced to buy ads to boost their reach.


You

You’ll see fewer of these stories now



The Free Ride Comes To An End


Once upon a time around 2009, Facebook needed brand content. It was trying to become the most interesting place on the web, so it let bands, fashion lines, sports teams, and news sites create Pages that could publish to the News Feed. Users could subscribe to the ones they wanted, and get news on all of them aggregated in the feed, augmenting the posts from friends.


But since then, Facebook has bashed face first into an inevitable math problem.


According to Zuckerberg’s Law, people share more online every year. Both people and Pages are posting more status updates, photos, videos, and links. Meanwhile, people are accumulating more Facebook friendships and Page subscriptions. But they’re not increasing the amount of time on the News Feed nearly fast enough to keep up with the increase in volume of content they might see.


facebook-news-feed-edgerank-algorithm


More competition for limited attention equals a decrease in reach. For people, that’s not too big of a deal. If they get fewer Likes on their selfie, nothing that bad will happen. But the decrease in reach has been brutal for some businesses who overextended on the assumption that the referral traffic and sales they got from the Facebook Page’s News Feed posts would sustain or grow, not shrink.


But Facebook has little choice. If it prioritizes brands over friends, people won’t keep coming back to the News Feed, and soon there won’t be an audience for anyone. It had to give friends more weight in the News Feed to keep the social network strong for years to come.


Get Down Or Lay Down


Many have suspected the reason Facebook decreased Page Reach was to con Pages into buying ads, but really, the drop in reach was unavoidable. Still, Facebook could use the lens of “We’re trying to make the experience better for end users” to pressure publishers to keep feeding it content in new ways.


In late 2012, I heard rumors of this plan, but it seemed far-fetched as Page reach was at its peak and Facebook was sending gobs of referral traffic to publishers and brands. But supposedly, Facebook was considering the idea of hosting publishers’ actual content, not just teaser previews and links to it, inside its News Feed. This way users wouldn’t have to click away from their friends and wait for sites to load to consume them.


Get Down Or Lay Down


Now the New York Times reports Facebook plans to test a way to host content from publishers like the New York Times in the coming months, with a potential ad revenue split. Users could read a whole article within Facebook. And thanks to Facebook’s massive scale and ad targeting prowess, it could show more relevant ads alongside the articles than the publishers could.


Since Facebook would consider avoiding extra clicks offsite as a better experience, it might be more willing to show this hosted content than links from publishers it doesn’t partner with. Depending on how aggressive Facebook gets with the plan, eventually, if you don’t partner with it, you could see your referral traffic dry up. For now, you either make non-spammy content that people actually want to see and that makes Facebook more fun, or you see your reach drop.


As they say in gangland, “Get down or lay down”.



Facebook News Feed Reprioritizes Your Real Friends Above Pages